Skip to main content

Table 2 Knowledge on EOL situations according to age category. Statistics presented: median (IQR: interquartile range); n(%). Statistical tests performed: Kruskall-Wallis test; chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test

From: Cross-referencing French hematology teams’ knowledge and perception of end-of-life situations: a national mixed-methods survey

 

All

Age (years)

p-value

  

< 30

30–50

51–60

> 60

 
  

n = 34

n = 106

n = 30

n = 12

 

Overall knowledge

7.1 (5.7,8.6)

7.9 (5.7, 9.6)

7.1 (5.7, 8.6)

5.7 (4.3, 7.1)

7.1 (5.4, 7.5)

0.13

Extensive

59 (32%)

17 (50%)

33 (31%)

6 (20%)

3 (25%)

 

Average

82 (45%)

9 (26%)

53 (50%)

14 (47%)

6 (50%)

 

Limited

41 (23%)

8 (24%)

20 (19%)

10 (33%)

3 (25%)

 

Identification of situations (/10)

7.1 (5.7,8.6)

8.6 (7.1,10.0)

8.6 (8.6,10.0)

5.7 (5.7,7.1)

7.1 (5.4,7.5)

0.012

Legal knowledge (/10)

9.3 (8.6,10.0)

10.0 (8.6,10.0)

7.1 (5.7,8.6)

10 (7.1, 10.0)

10.0 (9.6,10.0)

0.4

Specific knowledge

      

Double-effect treatment

83 (46%)

22 (65%)

48 (45%)

9 (30%)

4 (33%)

0.034

Treatment limitation and discontinuation

168 (92%)

31 (91%)

98 (92%)

28 (93%)

11 (92%)

0.9

Sedation for distress

92 (51%)

16 (47%)

58 (55%)

14 (47%)

4 (33%)

0.5

Deep and continuous sedation maintained until death

143 (79%)

25 (74%)

86 (81%)

21 (70%)

11 (92%)

0.4

Assisted suicide

131 (72%)

27 (79%)

74 (70%)

19 (63%)

11 (92%)

0.2

Euthanasia

83 (46%)

21 (62%)

48 (45%)

10 (33%)

4 (33%)

0.11